Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer electronics, and information technology company founded in 1865 which by 1998, had overtaken Motorola to become the world’s largest mobile phone brand. The Nokia brand is now controlled by HMD Global – a company founded by former Nokia employees that released a line of smartphones in 2017. The company’s failure to keep up with software-based iOS and Android operating systems made it lose its market leader position.
Aspect | Description |
---|---|
Founding and Early Success | Nokia, founded in 1865 in Finland, began as a pulp mill and evolved into a diverse conglomerate with interests in various industries. However, it gained global recognition for its foray into mobile phones and telecommunications equipment in the late 20th century. Nokia became the world’s leading mobile phone manufacturer, known for its durability and innovation. |
Dominance in Mobile Phones | During the late 1990s and early 2000s, Nokia dominated the mobile phone market, capturing a substantial market share. Iconic phones like the Nokia 3310 became cultural symbols of the era, known for their reliability and long battery life. |
Challenges from Competitors | Nokia faced increasing competition from companies like Apple and Samsung, which introduced smartphones with touchscreens and advanced operating systems. Nokia initially struggled to adapt to the rapidly changing mobile landscape. |
Strategic Partnership with Microsoft | In 2011, Nokia announced a strategic partnership with Microsoft to use the Windows Phone operating system in its smartphones, effectively discontinuing its Symbian platform. This move aimed to revive Nokia’s smartphone business by leveraging Microsoft’s software expertise. |
Decline in Market Share | Despite the partnership, Nokia continued to lose market share to competitors, particularly Android-based smartphones and iPhones. The transition to Windows Phone faced challenges, and the ecosystem struggled to gain traction. |
Acquisition by Microsoft | In 2014, Microsoft acquired Nokia’s Devices and Services division, effectively bringing an end to Nokia’s reign as a standalone mobile phone manufacturer. The acquisition aimed to integrate Nokia’s hardware with Microsoft’s software to create a more competitive smartphone ecosystem. |
Nokia’s Focus on Networks and Technologies | Following the acquisition, Nokia shifted its focus to its other businesses, including network infrastructure and patent licensing. It became a major player in the telecommunications equipment industry, supplying infrastructure for 5G networks and beyond. Additionally, Nokia continued to generate revenue by licensing its extensive patent portfolio. |
Return to Mobile Phones | Nokia made a return to the mobile phone market by licensing its brand to HMD Global in 2016. HMD Global produced Nokia-branded smartphones and feature phones, leveraging the nostalgia associated with the Nokia name. These phones ran on Android, marking a departure from the Windows Phone era. |
Ongoing Innovation | Nokia remained active in network technology innovation, including 5G and beyond. It also continued to explore emerging technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud networking. |
Legacy and Impact | Nokia’s legacy in the mobile phone industry endures through its historic dominance, iconic devices, and contributions to mobile technology. While it faced challenges in the smartphone era, Nokia’s focus on other business segments allowed it to maintain a presence in the technology sector. |
Background
Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer electronics, and information technology company founded in 1865 by Fredrik Idestam, Leo Mechelin, and Eduard Polón.
Nokia is perhaps best known for its mobile phones which dominated the industry before the invention of the smartphone. Not only were Nokia products built to last with long battery life, they were also a fashion statement.
In 1998, Nokia overtook Motorola to become the world’s largest mobile phone brand. Nine years later, it amassed a staggering 51% of the total global market share.
As is often the case, however, a meteoric rise is followed by a similarly meteoric fall.
So what happened to Nokia?
Hardware focus
Nokia was great at building device hardware, but a device built on software was the way of the future.
When the company realized this fact, Apple and Android had already developed their own app-based software and were years ahead.
Nokia would forever remain trapped by its unwieldy, device-centric operating system called Symbian. With each new Nokia mobile phone, there were release delays as code had to be developed and then tested. By 2009, the company was using 57 different and incompatible versions of its archaic operating system.
And indeed, in its falling history, Nokia also counted one of the worst selling phones. The idea was pretty good (combining gaming with phones), but the UX and the timing not as good:
Operating system resistance
When Google entered the smartphone market in 2008, peers such as Samsung, Huawei, and Motorola switched to the Android operating system to remain competitive.
Nokia remained reluctant to do the same until 2011 when it partnered with Microsoft to secure Windows Phone as its primary OS. Unfortunately, Android can now be found in 80% of all smartphones while Windows Phone no longer exists.
Nokia belatedly switched to Android in 2014, but the damage had been done.
Mismanagement and poor culture
In a paper titled Distributed Attention and Shared Emotions in the Innovation Process: How Nokia Lost the Smartphone Battle, researchers published the results of 76 interviews with Nokia management staff.
Among the revelations were that:
- Nokia suffered from organizational fear with temperamental leaders and frightened middle managers being the status quo.
- Some management staff intimidated their subordinates by accusing them of not being ambitious enough. Others lacked technical competence which influenced their assessment of technological limitations during goal-setting. In comparison, similar positions at Apple were all held by competent engineers.
- Senior leadership was afraid of not meeting quarterly targets.
- Executives were also afraid to publicly acknowledge or comment on the inferiority of Symbian.
- Top executives were wary of admitting inferiority to Apple for fear of losing investors, suppliers, or customers.
Aside from the poor culture, the decision to move from an organizational structure to a matrix structure in 2004 also harmed Nokia. Power struggles ensued with many key personnel departing the company soon after.
Nokia today
Unlike many other companies, Nokia’s failure to innovate did not lead to bankruptcy or acquisition.
Today, Nokia appears to have left mobile phone development in the past. The Nokia brand is now controlled by HMD Global – a company founded by former Nokia employees that released a line of smartphones in 2017.
The company still manufactures hardware and is involved in the roll-out of the 5G wireless network, among other things.
It also earns a considerable income from the hundreds of patents it owns and licenses to mobile phone vendors.
Key takeaways:
- Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer technology, and information technology company founded in 1865. It enjoyed 51% of the global market share for mobile phones in 1998.
- Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind.
- Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.
Timeline
- Nokia’s Rise to Dominance: Founded in 1865, Nokia became the world’s largest mobile phone brand by 1998, overtaking Motorola, and secured 51% of the global market share.
- Failure to Embrace Software: Nokia excelled in hardware but failed to keep up with the software-based iOS and Android operating systems, which became the future of the mobile industry.
- Struggles with Symbian OS: Nokia remained trapped by its unwieldy operating system called Symbian, leading to release delays and the use of multiple incompatible versions.
- Reluctance to Adopt Android: While competitors embraced Android, Nokia was hesitant and only partnered with Microsoft for Windows Phone in 2011, which proved less successful.
- Mismanagement and Organizational Issues: Nokia suffered from mismanagement, a poor corporate culture, and resistance to acknowledge weaknesses, hindering innovation.
- Transition and Brand Control: Nokia’s failure to innovate did not lead to bankruptcy; instead, the brand is now controlled by HMD Global, founded by former Nokia employees, releasing smartphones in 2017.
- Focus on Patents and 5G: Nokia shifted its focus away from mobile phones and remains involved in manufacturing hardware and deploying the 5G wireless network. It earns income from its extensive patent portfolio licensed to other mobile phone vendors.
Year | Event | Description |
---|---|---|
1865 | Nokia founded as a pulp mill in Finland. | Nokia, originally a pulp mill founded by Fredrik Idestam, Leo Mechelin, and Eduard Polón, transitions into a diverse conglomerate with interests in various industries. |
1998 | Nokia becomes the world’s largest mobile phone brand, overtaking Motorola. | Nokia achieves global recognition in the mobile phone industry, surpassing Motorola to secure the position as the world’s largest mobile phone brand with a substantial market share. |
Late 1990s | Nokia dominates the mobile phone market, known for iconic devices like the Nokia 3310. | Nokia experiences significant success in the mobile phone market, capturing a substantial market share and becoming synonymous with durable, reliable devices like the Nokia 3310. |
2000s | Increasing competition from smartphones with touchscreens and advanced operating systems. | Nokia faces growing competition from companies like Apple and Samsung, which introduce smartphones with touchscreens and advanced operating systems, challenging Nokia’s dominance. |
2011 | Nokia announces a strategic partnership with Microsoft to use Windows Phone OS. | Nokia partners with Microsoft to adopt the Windows Phone operating system, discontinuing its Symbian platform, in an effort to revive its smartphone business and leverage Microsoft’s software expertise. |
2014 | Microsoft acquires Nokia’s Devices and Services division. | Microsoft acquires Nokia’s Devices and Services division, marking the end of Nokia’s standalone mobile phone manufacturing business as it integrates Nokia’s hardware with Microsoft’s software. |
2016 | Nokia licenses its brand to HMD Global for smartphone production. | Nokia licenses its brand to HMD Global, a company founded by former Nokia employees, to produce Nokia-branded smartphones, marking a return to the mobile phone market after the Microsoft acquisition. |
Ongoing | Nokia shifts focus to network infrastructure and patent licensing. | Following the Microsoft acquisition, Nokia focuses on network infrastructure and patent licensing, becoming a major player in the telecommunications equipment industry and generating revenue from its patent portfolio. |
Other Failure Stories
What Happened to WeWork
![what-happened-to-wework](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/what-happened-to-wework.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-wework](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/what-happened-to-wework.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to Netscape
![what-happened-to-netscape](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/what-happened-to-netscape.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-netscape](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/what-happened-to-netscape.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to Musical.ly
![what-happened-to-musically](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/what-happened-to-musically-1.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-musically](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/what-happened-to-musically-1.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to Vine
![what-happened-to-vine](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/what-happened-to-vine.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-vine](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/what-happened-to-vine.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to CNN Plus
![what-happened-to-cnn-plus](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/what-happened-to-cnn-plus.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-cnn-plus](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/what-happened-to-cnn-plus.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to Clubhouse
![what-happened-to-clubhouse](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/what-happened-to-clubhouse.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-clubhouse](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/what-happened-to-clubhouse.png?resize=1024%2C760&ssl=1)
What Happened to Facebook
![what-happened-to-facebook](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/what-happened-to-facebook.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-facebook](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/what-happened-to-facebook.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
What Happened To Carvana
![what-happened-to-carvana](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/what-happened-to-carvana-1.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-carvana](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/what-happened-to-carvana-1.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
What Happened To Houseparty
![what-happened-to-houseparty](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/what-happened-to-houseparty.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-houseparty](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/what-happened-to-houseparty.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
What Happened To ChaCha
![what-happened-to-chacha](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-chacha.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-chacha](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-chacha.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation.
ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.
What Happened To RadioShack
![what-happened-to-radioshack](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-radioshack.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-radioshack](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-radioshack.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix.
RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.
What Happened To Compaq
![what-happened-to-compaq](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-compaq.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-compaq](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-compaq.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share.
Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.
What Happened To Kodak
![what-happened-to-kodak](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-kodak.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-kodak](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-kodak.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable.
Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.
What Happened To Friendster
![what-happened-to-friendster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-friendster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-friendster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-friendster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years.
Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.
What Happened To StumbleUpon
![what-happened-to-stumbleupon](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-stumbleupon.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-stumbleupon](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-stumbleupon.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
StumbleUpon suffered intense competition from the likes of Pinterest, Digg, and Reddit – both in terms of site functionality and monetization strategy. After a failed partnership with eBay, Camp bought back the company and instituted a major redesign to limited success.
The StumbleUpon user experience became outdated as consumers preferred to waste time scrolling through news feeds. Upon this realization, Camp shut down the service in 2018 to focus on a more modern iteration called Mix.com
What Happened To Altavista
![what-happened-to-altavista](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-altavista.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-altavista](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-altavista.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
After an ominous partnership with Yahoo in 1996, AltaVista underwent a series of acquisitions and format charges as several companies tried to make it profitable. In the process, the search engine lost market share to up-and-comer Google.
Yahoo acquired AltaVista in 2003 and absorbed the technology behind the search engine into its own platform. AltaVista was formally put to rest ten years later.
What Happened To Blockbuster
![what-happened-to-blockbuster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-blockbuster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-blockbuster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-blockbuster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Blockbuster relied on late fees to drive a high proportion of revenue. This strategy proved uncompetitive after Netflix offered fee-free movie rentals by mail. Blockbuster lost significant market share to Netflix in the ensuing years and experienced a decline in profit after abolishing late fees in an attempt to remain competitive.
Blockbuster’s demise is mostly due to an inability to innovate. Although passing on the offer to purchase Netflix is noteworthy, the company failed because of a myopic focus on its outdated rental franchise model.
What Happened To Napster
![what-happened-to-napster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-napster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-napster](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-napster.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Napster quickly attracted the attention of music artists, with Metallica instigating court proceedings against the company for copyright infringement and the distribution of unreleased music.
Napster was forced to shut down after the Recording Industry Association of America won a court injunction. Mounting legal fees and compensation costs led to the company filing for bankruptcy in 2002.
What Happened To BlackBerry
![what-happened-to-blackberry](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-blackberry.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-blackberry](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-blackberry.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
BlackBerry was ignorant and in some ways disrespectful of competitors in the industry. It was more concerned with protecting its proprietary technology than innovating to stay relevant.
Though profitable to some extent, BlackBerry’s focus on enterprise customers came at the expense of the far more lucrative consumer market. Government opposition to censoring information also eroded one of the core strengths of the company’s smartphone.
Why Nokia Failed
![why-nokia-failed](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/why-nokia-failed.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![why-nokia-failed](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/why-nokia-failed.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind.
Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.
What Happened To Xerox
![what-happened-to-xerox](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-xerox.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-xerox](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-xerox.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Xerox was visited by Steve Jobs in 1979 who gained access to PARC in exchange for Xerox receiving shares in Apple. He then purchased the rights to a Xerox GUI and used it to produce the Apple Macintosh.
Xerox released the Xerox Star personal computer in 1981 in a rare example of the company selling an innovative product commercially. However, the Star was prohibitively expensive, targeted the wrong market, and was a decade ahead of its time.
What Happened To Quibi
![what-happened-to-quibi](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-quibi.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![what-happened-to-quibi](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/what-happened-to-quibi.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Despite billions being invested in securing high-end talent and production studios, Quibi content was generally poor quality. In any case, there was no way for consumers to share or engage with the content they did enjoy.
Quibi was not helped by its pricing strategy and the presence of established competitors offering more for less. It was also improperly and inadequately marketed.
Read Next: Business Model Innovation, Business Models.
Related Innovation Frameworks
Business Engineering
![business-engineering-manifesto](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/business-engineering-1.png?resize=1024%2C817&ssl=1)
![business-engineering-manifesto](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/business-engineering-1.png?resize=1024%2C817&ssl=1)
Business Model Innovation
![business-model-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/business-model-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![business-model-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/business-model-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Innovation Theory
![innovation-theory](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/innovation-theory-1.png?resize=1920%2C1426&ssl=1)
![innovation-theory](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/innovation-theory-1.png?resize=1920%2C1426&ssl=1)
Types of Innovation
![types-of-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/types-of-innovation-1.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![types-of-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/types-of-innovation-1.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Continuous Innovation
![continuous-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/continuous-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C753&ssl=1)
![continuous-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/continuous-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C753&ssl=1)
Disruptive Innovation
![disruptive-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/disruptive-innovation.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
![disruptive-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/disruptive-innovation.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
Business Competition
![business-competition](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/business-competition.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
![business-competition](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/business-competition.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
Technological Modeling
![technological-modeling](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/technological-modeling-1.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
![technological-modeling](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/technological-modeling-1.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
Diffusion of Innovation
![diffusion-of-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/diffusion-of-innovation.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
![diffusion-of-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/diffusion-of-innovation.png?resize=1920%2C1448&ssl=1)
Frugal Innovation
![frugal-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/frugal-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![frugal-innovation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/frugal-innovation.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Constructive Disruption
![constructive-disruption](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/constructive-disruption.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![constructive-disruption](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/constructive-disruption.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Growth Matrix
![growth-strategies](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/growth-strategies.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![growth-strategies](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/growth-strategies.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Innovation Funnel
![innovation-funnel](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/innovation-funnel.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![innovation-funnel](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/innovation-funnel.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Idea Generation
![idea-generation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/idea-generation.png?resize=1024%2C600&ssl=1)
![idea-generation](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/idea-generation.png?resize=1024%2C600&ssl=1)
Design Thinking
![design-thinking](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/design-thinking.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
![design-thinking](https://i0.wp.com/fourweekmba.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/design-thinking.png?resize=1024%2C772&ssl=1)
Related
Source link